🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," stated a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is primarily occurring at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in safety.

While this international discussion continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.