🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a flawed assessment of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "woke" policies represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. However, this perspective rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge confronting the EU is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, about half of the world’s top fifty technology firms are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening disparity is driven by stronger productivity growth in the US, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Experts widely agree it is essentially a contest between two between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population, is split among 27 separate regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these challenges, there are reasons for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for major reforms.

With the right incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths might enable much higher levels of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses considerable strengths: high-quality workforce, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. However, without decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.